Monday, February 6, 2017

Quiz time!


You have a 10-year-old boy named Arnold. He is likely dyslexic, and has had some English education, placing in at about level 1-4. There is a 1-4 class with students aged 8, and a 2-5 level class aged 10. Where does he go?

You have a 12 year-old-boy, Dan, who speaks absolutely no English, doesn’t know the alphabet, so should be in a Phonics class. The Phonics 1 (0-1) class is all 6 year-olds. There are 2 classes with 12 year-olds; they are in levels 4-6 and 5-8 respectively. Where does he go?

Your answer, of course, is both boys go into the class that matches their AGE, NOT their level. So, Dan goes into the 4-6 class. With Arnold, you have TWO things to do: ignore and deny the dyslexia, and of course put him in level 2-5 with his peers.

When the native teacher asks if you understand but you didn’t, say yes to the teacher. The 8 times she asks the class if they understand and have questions, as a class just sit there and stare, or nod finally when she asks a few more times, saying, “Yes, I understand.” Then, go home and tell your parents in Korean that you don’t know how to say you don’t understand, when your class is currently writing sentences about hobbies, things you and your individual family members enjoy doing together, so that your parents can call the school and tell the owner that your child doesn’t understand… and doesn’t know how to say they don’t understand or know the English word. Most students don’t remember, apparently, most of the words that they learned in 0-1, nor that putting “no” in front of “understand,” a word you JUST USED, conveys just that meaning. Do not look at the teacher quizzically to convey confusion, or use any words at all to say anything.

In Asia, each year of age means anyone younger has to defer to you. So a whole classroom must now defer completely to the one older student, or the young student can never participate at all, because they must defer to everyone else. It’s likely that the older kid’s parents will scream at the school that their child isn’t stupid, so they shouldn’t be in a class with kids even 2 years younger.

Make sure, as well, that all kids move up a level regardless of their understanding and mastery of the current level, because otherwise their parents will probably get mad and pull them from your school. Many Korean parents, who don’t speak a word of English, believe that simply being in a classroom with someone speaking to them in English for a couple hours/day will give them native fluency in about 6 months to a year. Any slower progress, and the parents get upset because the teachers are bad. Make the native English teacher teach a writing class with high beginners who have never learned the different tenses nor how to make a sentence.  

2 comments:

  1. that stuff happens here. i think after arnie d left chicago for washington, chi pub schools started 'just passing kids' like other districts were doing because it helped their self esteem and were actually more likely NOT to give up/finish HS if they were passed vs. holding them to their actual level...

    and now all this stuff with DeVos, the conversation for kids with no resources or who dont have resources to attain higher ed, the big thing in cps is growth vs. i dont know what they call it, meeting standards- so progressing from level 1 to 2 or 3 is WAY better than just trying but knowing you wont get the kid at level 4, because they are still at level 1...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great point, though many public schools, particularly Chicago and other very underfunded ones, have been passing kids who don't meet the criteria for ages. I've read, though highly doubt it's that high, where kids graduating high school still can't read because they just kept getting passed on to the next grade.

      Still, they WILL hold kids back for at least one year, or used to, in the US. Here, it's strictly because of age. An expat woman was having an issue with a taxi driver. He wasn't doing anything violent or terrible, but still breaking the law. A cop was outside the taxi, so she told him what was happening. Thanks to the cop being younger, of course, he explained to her that it was just a cultural/language misunderstanding, and didn't do anything but call the taxi driver 'uncle' (as they do for older people), and let him go. Parts prejudice, of course, but also the idiotic age thing. You want to talk about entitled old people? Look NO further than Asia.

      Delete